Last
time I talked about the concept of “racing room” and the shared
responsibility of making a safe pass. But, what happens if you are
involved in an incident?
First, if you are by yourself and contact is made
with a stationary object, you are subject to penalty just as if there
were another car involved. However, the Competition Steward does have
some leeway in how long your probation can last (3, 6 or 13 months).
This will basically depend on a) how stupid your mistake was, b) how
much damage was inflicted, and c) how much risk you became to other
drivers nearby.
If you make contact with another car while racing,
things are a little different. Bear in mind that, as stated in the
rulebook, the driver(s) involved in any contact incident are required to
report to the Competition Steward (with their car(s) within thirty
minutes of the end of the session in which the incident occurred.
Failing to do so will ensure a minimum of a three month probation. The
Comp and Tech Stewards must then attempt to determine who is at fault in
the incident. This is done by gathering whatever evidence can be found.
This entails inspecting the damage to the vehicles, talking to corner
workers who witnessed the incident, interviewing the drivers of the
vehicles, viewing videotape of the incident whether taken from inside
one or more of the cars involved or from another car or even from a
spectator. After all the evidence is weighed the stewards will make a
decision as to where the fault should lie. The offending driver(s) will
be placed on 13 months probation and excluded from the remainder of the
event in which the incident occurred. If it is a multi-day event the
Comp Steward can make the exclusion effective for the rest of the day of
the incident or the remainder of the event. (There is also a substantial
penalty in points, but I’m not going to get into that here.)
The only way that this decision can be overturned
is through the appeal process. A penalized driver has fourteen days from
the day of the incident to file his appeal with the National Competition
Steward. The NatCompStew then reviews the submission, copies everything
submitted (including videotape) and distributes the materials to the
Appeals Committee. The Appeals Committee consists of the National
Competition Steward, the National Technical Steward, one Regional
Competition Steward, one Regional Tech Steward, and one CRAC
representative. In the event that one or more of these individuals were
involved in the original decision, they will be replaced by a suitable
substitute. The committee will independently review the appeal filed and
render a decision. This decision is final.
What constitutes a good appeal, you ask? Well a
good appeal is not based on the statement “It wasn’t my fault”. A
well-founded appeal will contain new evidence or some evidence not
considered by the stewards originally involved in the decision. This
is a key point. Unless some evidence of this nature is submitted, there
is no basis for the appeal. The appeal should be well organized and
clearly and concisely stated. Any videotape submitted should be of good
quality and be limited to the time frame of the incident in question,
unless the appellate feels that some prior behavior or event has some
bearing on the incident that took place. If this is the case it is very
important that the appellate define what event or behavior is relevant
to the incident under appeal.
Well, I hope that this little treatise on the
appeals process has been enlightening for you and that since it is such
a hassle to file a proper appeal, all of you will decide its just better
not to risk contact than to have to go through the very time consuming
process of filing a proper appeal. Remember that you’ll still be on
probation/suspension until a decision is rendered by the Appeals
Committee.
We welcome Sue Rathbone to the fold as our newest Competition
Steward. Sue will be working the New Hampshire races this year. Here is
what she has to say:
"My first track day was at a COM weekend in 1991 at NHIS because
someone offered me the use of their racecar. That winter I started ice
racing in a road course, pack style series in New York and raced there
for several years. When summer arrived, I got a SCCA license to go road
racing. I raced Show Stock nationally and professionally along with
regional IT racing for several years. A friend of mine from SCCA was
registrar at the Boston Chapter BMW ice time trials and I went along one
day to give him a hand with registration. He loaned me his '87 Audi
Quattro to take out on the ice (way sweet!). Then he took me to the
Chapter board meetings because he said they were a good group of folks
and yakked nonstop about cars. He was right, so I joined and have been
there since 1995 helping out with chapter driving events."
We also are pleased to welcome Anne and Bob Varey of Pickering,
Ontario!
"Anne has been the Canada G.T. Challenge Cup Series Chief
Steward for the last four years and prior to that she was the Series
Deputy Steward. This Series was a closed wheel professional race series
of 9-12 events sanctioned by the national sanctioning body in Canada -
ASN Canada FIA. She has been a Regional Race Steward for 9 years as well
as a Scrutineer [that's Canadian for Tech, ehh. -ed.] for
Regional race events. Anne also competed as a Regional Race Driver for
several years and has recently re-qualified for her race license (after
taking a break as a competitor).
"Bob was volunteer Regional Chief Scrutineer for seven years
before retiring to spend all his spare time looking after the Canada G.T.
Challenge Cup Series as Series Director, Deputy Steward and Series Chief
Timekeeper.
"As members of the local BMW club for several years we both have
enjoyed assisting at the Club race events as well as participating in
our own cars in the advanced drivers schools. Bob holds a current
Ontario Regional Race License. In addition to assisting at the BMW CCA
Club Racing events in Canada, we also have assisted at the Porsche Club
race weekends.
"We look forward to our association with the great group of
workers in the BMW CCA organization [and we, yours! -ed.]."